This article in the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (July-August 2009, 16: 4; 471-479), by Michael R. Laurent and Tim. J, Vickers, Faculty of Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, Belgium, "measured Wikipedia's ranking on general Internet search
engines by entering keywords from MedlinePlus, NHS Direct Online, and
the National Organization of Rare Diseases as queries into search
engine optimization software. We assessed whether article quality
influenced this ranking. . . . Results: Wikipedia ranked among the first ten results in 71–85% of search
engines and keywords tested. Wikipedia surpassed MedlinePlus and NHS
Direct Online (except for queries from the latter on Google UK), and
ranked higher with quality articles. Wikipedia ranked highest for rare
diseases, although its incidence in several categories decreased. . . . Wikipedia articles were viewed
more often than MedlinePlus Topic (p = 0.001) but for MedlinePlus
Encyclopedia pages, the trend was not significant (p = 0.07–0.10). Based
on its search engine ranking and page view statistics, the English
Wikipedia is a prominent source of online health information compared
to the other online health information providers studied."
